Live analysis of brand visibility across GPT-4, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5. Updated weekly.
Editorial • LLM Radar Research
Cross-model analysis of smartphones brands reveals shifting recommendation patterns. Top brands maintain their positions through strong review signals, but challenger brands are gaining ground in specific query verticals.
| # | Asset | Share of Model | ACS | The Verdict | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Apple $APPL | 55% | 100 | The undisputed default; every AI model recommends iPhone first. Seamless ecosystem integration (Mac, iPad, Watch) Premium pricing with no true budget option | View Intel |
2 | Xiaomi $XIAO | 42% | 93 | Unbeatable value leader; AI models default for budget queries. Unmatched specs-per-dollar ratio MIUI ads and bloatware in UI | View Intel |
3 | Samsung $SAMS | 38% | 86 | Strong Android pick; hardware innovation praised. Best-in-class display technology (AMOLED) Bloatware and duplicate Samsung/Google apps | View Intel |
4 | Google Pixel $GOOG | 22% | 79 | Camera darling; AI models highlight computational photography. Best computational photography in any phone Hardware design feels less premium than rivals | View Intel |
Apple consistently ranks first across all AI models for general smartphones queries.
Budget-conscious buyers are increasingly recommended Samsung by cost-sensitive prompts.
Data calibrated against GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro recommendations. Updated weekly.